Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Friday, January 20, 2012

Maxwell Beech’s ‘second chance’ less likely in future

The real-life story of a Brampton man who was given a reprieve by a judge and turned his life around could soon be fodder for fables.

And that’s because Bill C10, expected to pass into law in Canada by the end of March, will make second chances a thing of the past. Instead, the bill’s mandatory minimum sentences will make sure that people like Maxwell Beech go to jail.

Beech was charged with gun and drug-related offences seven years ago, but by the time he appeared for sentencing before Judge Hugh Atwood he had found God.

On that fateful day, Beech remembers, “I really deserved to have had the book thrown at me.”

But he told the judge, “I want you to know I’m a changed man,” and explained how he wanted to be a good dad to his newborn son.

Instead of sentencing Beech to the Crown’s recommended four years, Judge Hugh Atwood allowed him to serve 90 days on weekends.

On Thursday, the Star’s Jennifer Pagliaro told the story of how Beech brought a Brampton courtroom to tears this week when he stopped in unannounced to thank Atwood for giving him the chance to turn his life around. The father of four now runs his own business installing blinds and home security systems.

“The problem with mandatory minimums is exactly exemplified by (Beech’s) story,” says Peter Rosenthal, a Toronto lawyer and adjunct professor of law at the University of Toronto. “Traditionally, sentencing is supposed to be based on the nature of the crime, the details of the crime and the details of the offender. And in some cases, it would be entirely inappropriate to send someone to jail for a mandatory minimum period of time if that person has turned themselves around.”

Beech was overwhelmed Wednesday by requests to speak with media, offenders and youth groups.

One request, received by the Star, was for Beech to speak at the Second Chance Conference, run by Toronto’s Young Advocates Youth Organization. The conference aims to educate about and organize national strategies for offenders re-entering society. The current speaker’s list includes Alvin Curling, former Speaker in the Ontario Legislature.

Beech said at least one government official has encouraged him to continue telling his story, in hopes it may influence public opinion about mandatory minimum sentences. He said he hasn’t made any decision yet, but will be responding to requests as soon as possible.

“Look at this story. The story is unbelievable,” says Beech’s former lawyer, Gary Batasar.

“This guy came back seven years later and thanked the judge. But what would have happened to him if had not had this opportunity? His child would have gone to CAS (Children’s Aid Society). He would be in jail. There are so many variables.

“This is a testament to the fact, not withstanding that crime is on the decrease, the government we have in power right now is of the opinion that minimum mandatory sentences are a policy they are going to push forward,” Batasar says.

Bill C10 contains several amendments to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, including the introduction of mandatory minimum sentences for serious drug offences, such as “dealing drugs for organized crime purposes or using a weapon or violence when involved … in drug-related activities,” according to information on the Parliament of Canada website.

Growing more than five marijuana plants for the purposes of trafficking will have a minimum jail term of six months. Selling Schedule I drugs such as cocaine or methamphetamines will result in mandatory sentences of a year.

The bill passed the second reading of the Senate in December and has been referred to the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, which has yet to issue its report. It will become law once it passes a third reading by the Senate and goes to the Governor General for Royal Assent.

Mandatory minimums take “away the discretion of the judge. That’s the point of it,” says Rosenthal. “There are some instances where it’s not appropriate. You can never design a law that’s going to be appropriate in all cases. That’s why you need some discretion in the law.”

Original Article
Source:

No comments:

Post a Comment