Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Wednesday, February 01, 2012

A number is never just a number: Grey power

• 0

Number of times Prime Minister Stephen Harper campaigned on proposed changes to Canada's Old Age Security (OAS) during the 2011 federal election.

• 1985

The last time a prime minister (Brian Mulroney) tried to change the public pension system without campaigning to do it during the federal election. A seniors' movement dubbed Grey Power forced him to back off. (Source and source)

• 1952

Year Canada implemented the Old Age Security Act. The OAS plays a role in replacing pre-retirement earnings. (Source)

• 38

Percentage of Canadians covered by a workplace pension, making public programs such as the OAS important, especially to lower-income Canadians. (Source)

• 39

Percentage of lowest-income Canadian parents who reported in 2009 that they were not preparing financially for their retirement. (Source)

• 1 in 2

Number of middle-income baby boomers in Canada who face a severe cut to their living standards in old age, due to falling employer pension coverage. (Source)

• 65

The most common pensionable age within OECD countries and Canada's official retirement age. (Source)

• 67

The speculated hike in OAS age eligibility following Prime Minister Harper's ominous warnings of changes in Davos on January 26, 2012. (Source and source)

• $12,192

Amount seniors could lose if Canada pushes the OAS eligibility age from 65 to 67. (Source)

• Half

Number of all low-income Canadian men who will collect an OAS/GIS cheque for only 10 years. The poorest 20 per cent of Canadians pass away 5.6 years earlier than the richest 20 per cent. (Source)

• 4

Percentage of GDP the OAS and CPP combined cost Canada; a bargain compared to Germany and Belgium's 10 per cent and Italy's 14 per cent. (Source)

• 4.4 per cent

Canadian poverty rate among seniors in the mid-2000s, one of the lowest among OECD nations, whose average is 13.3 per cent. (Source)

• 5-10

Number of years the Harper Conservatives say they would take to phase in the proposed OAS changes. (Source)

• 75

Percentage of Canadian seniors over the age of 65 who are "reliable voters," meaning they voted in the previous federal, provincial and municipal elections. Nearly 90 per cent vote in federal elections. (Source)

• October 19, 2015

Canada's next federal election.

Original Article
Source: Rabble.ca 
Author: Trish Hennessy  

No comments:

Post a Comment