Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Overwhelming majority supports revoking citizenship for Canadians who commit treason

A new public opinion poll has found overwhelming support for a proposal to revoke the citizenship of those who commit acts of treason and terrorism against their fellow Canadians, a Calgary MP said Monday.

Eight out of 10 people polled by NRG Research agreed Canadians guilty of treason should lose their citizenship. A similar ratio favoured revoking citizenship from terrorists who target their countrymen.

The poll was commissioned by Devinder Shory, the Conservative MP for Calgary Northeast, who has tabled a private member’s bill that proposes stripping citizenship from Canadians who commit acts of war against the Canadian Forces.

“Canadian citizenship is a privilege, not a right,” he said in a statement Monday. “Anyone who commits an act of war or terrorism against Canada, who acts against Canadians and Canadian laws and values, should be stripped of the privilege of being a Canadian citizen.”

The telephone poll canvassed 1,000 Canadians. The results are considered accurate within 3.1 percentage points 19 times out of 20.

Only 13% of those polled were against revoking citizenship for treason, while 14% disagreed it should be done for terrorism.

Mr. Shory’s bill, C-425, was introduced in May and remains at the early stages. Most private member’s bills never become law. It is scheduled for second reading in the House of Commons next Tuesday.

Under his proposal to amend the Citizenship Act, only Canadians who are also citizens of another country would lose their status as Canadians. The bill would also apply to permanent residents who commit treason by taking away their right to apply for citizenship.

The amendment reads: “A Canadian who is also a citizen or a legal resident of a country other than Canada is deemed to have made an application for renunciation of their Canadian citizenship if they engage in an act of war against the Canadian Armed Forces.”

Another section of the bill would allow permanent residents serving in the Canadian Forces to apply for citizenship after two years, rather than the required three. Few non-Canadians serve in the forces, although those with specialized skills are sometimes brought in.

Should the bill defy the odds and become law, it could conceivably be used against people who have traveled to war zones such as Afghanistan, Bosnia or Libya to join armed groups that fought against Canadian troops.

But support from Opposition parties, and even the Conservative caucus, is far from certain. Revoking citizenship is highly sensitive. Even taking away the citizenship of Nazi war criminals who lied their way into Canada has proven challenging for the government.

Original Article
Source: national post
Author: Stewart Bell

No comments:

Post a Comment