Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Old (white) boys club alive and well in law, finance: U.S. study

The proverbial old boys clubs in elite professions may no longer have rules keeping women and minorities out, but an analysis of their hiring practices suggests their upper-class, male and white makeup will stubbornly remain.

According to a new U.S.-based study, bankers, lawyers and management consultants would rather hire someone who is like them than someone who is best qualified for the job — perpetuating the social and cultural makeup of these professions and reinforcing the glass ceiling that has been battled for decades.

“Of course, employers are looking for people who have the baseline of skills to effectively do the job,” said study author Lauren A. Rivera, an assistant professor of management and organizations and sociology at Northwestern University. “But, beyond that, employers really want people who they will bond with, who they will feel good around, who will be their friend and maybe even their romantic partner. As a result, employers don’t necessarily hire the most-skilled candidates.”

Because evaluators in these fields are predominantly white, Ivy League-educated, upper-middle or upper class men, Rivera says they tend to favour candidates who have similar interests and pursuits.

Appearing in the American Sociological Review Thursday, the study titled “Hiring as Cultural Matching: The Case of Elite Professional Service Firms,” claims to be the first systematic, empirical investigation of whether shared culture between employers and job candidates affects hiring.

Rivera observed hiring practices and conducted interviews with recruitment and hiring managers in elite U.S. investment banks, law firms, and management consulting firms.

There are no comparable studies in Ontario, but the Law Society of Upper Canada has a voluntary questionnaire on race filled out by slightly more than half the lawyers in the province. According to their statistics, minorities make up 17-18 per cent of lawyers, compared to 23 per cent of the total population.

But these statistics are inadequate and don’t provide the impetus to improve diversity at firms, says Toronto lawyer Julian Falconer.

Falconer, who is also a bencher at the Law Society of Upper Canada says that unlike here, detailed race and cultural breakdowns for American firms are available in the States.

“That speaks volumes to the Canadian mentality,” he said. “We still are very uncomfortable discussing these issues as law firms and I think we have miles to go in terms of openly talking about these issues and being openly transparent and accessible about these issues.”

In her study, Rivera notes that women and minorities are being hired as long as they share the same dominant cultural traits as their employers.

This is “providing new opportunities for women and ethnic minorities who display the right stocks of cultural signals, as did many of the athletic, affluent, Ivy League-educated white and non-white women and men who were hired,” wrote Rivera in the study.

Original Article
Source: the star
Author: Marco Chown Oved 

No comments:

Post a Comment