Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Tuesday, January 08, 2013

Banks' Charity, Philanthropic Giving Only Reaches 'Mediocre' Levels

The philanthropic practices of the United States' four megabanks are "mediocre" at best, an independent watchdog has concluded.

A report released Thursday by the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP), the only independent watchdog of institutional philanthropy, found that Wells Fargo, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs have tried to use charity as a way to boost their tarnished images, but those banks lack transparency and donate at disappointing levels.

"These guys brag about their philanthropy on Capitol Hill, and it's our job to make sure lawmakers don't get bamboozled and that they complete the job of financial reform," NCRP field director, Sean Dobson, told American Banker.

One of the main critiques in the report, provocatively titled “Take and Give: The Crimes and Philanthropy of Banks of America, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase,” is that the megabanks give at “lackluster” levels.

According to the report, the corporations list their for-profit investments, as well as their employees’ charity giving, as part of their own philanthropic endeavors.

Wells Fargo, for example, in June unveiled a $30.1 billion environmental initiative to be doled out over the course of eight years. But of that pledge, just $100 million will be given as cash grants to environmental nonprofits, which comprises 0.016 percent of the bank's yearly revenue. The rest will be allocated as for-profit loans.

The report also notes these banks count employee donations and company volunteer hours as part of their philanthropic giving, even though they may only partially subsidize workers for the time they donate.

To measure the overall giving levels of each bank, the report took into account cash grants made from each corporation’s foundation. It also looked into how much each bank donated as compared with standards from the Center Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy (CECP) on “the total giving as a percentage of revenue” among financial companies. On that data, the report concluded that Bank of America's and Wells Fargo’s giving levels are “mediocre,” JPMorgan Chase gives at “disappointing” levels and Goldman Sachs is “miserly.”

The report also blasted the banks for not outright listing the recipients of their charitable grants. Because such grants are often disbursed through corporate treasuries, the banks aren’t required to publicly list the names of the receiving organizations in public filings.

Spokespeople for JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America disputed the report's claims to American Banker, and a Wells Fargo representative refuted the report's charges of obscurity.

"Countless times we've provided lists of organizations that have received our grants,” Wells Fargo's head of philanthropy, Tim Hanlon, said in a statement, according to American Banker. “Had the NCRP asked for such a report, we would have gladly given it to them. We generally provide them to anyone who asks."

Original Article
Source: huffington post
Author: Eleanor Goldberg

No comments:

Post a Comment