Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Saskatchewan robocalls: The Prime Minister is the pot

In my last post, I noted that the Conservative Party admitted it was behind recent misleading robocalls in Saskatchewan only after being confronted by forensic evidence linking it to the calls.

When confronted with the facts, the Prime Minister made this claim:

"There is no violation of the CRTC rules, in this case, unlike what the Liberal party did in a very different case …"

He was referring to a call sent out by the campaign of Liberal MP Frank Valeriote (Guelph) days before the 2011 election. That call offended CRTC rules because it failed to properly indicate that it was being made on behalf of Mr. Valeriote. Of course, the recent CPC robocall also failed to identify that it was being made on behalf of the Conservative Party.

Further, unlike Mr. Valeriote's call, which conveyed accurate information questioning the Conservative Party candidate's position on abortion, even Mr. Tom Lukiwski, the government's deputy House leader, described the CPC call as "deceptive." It's hard to disagree. First, the call masqueraded as public opinion research when in fact it was a "push poll" promoting a partisan political message. Second, it suggested that certain proposed riding boundary changes would pit urban areas against rural ones and offend "Saskatchewan values." In fact, the proposed changes emanated from an independent commission.

But the other difference between Mr. Valeriote and Mr. Harper is that, once discovered, Mr. Valeriote admitted that his campaign was behind the call, co-operated fully with the CRTC, and paid his fine. In this case, Mr. Valeriote is clearly the kettle.

Original Article
Source: rabble.ca
Author: Steven Shrybman

No comments:

Post a Comment