Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Federal government leaves door open to joining U.S.-led missile defence system

OTTAWA — The Conservative government on Monday refused to rule out joining a U.S.-led anti-missile defence shield, which opposition parties described as a boondoggle waiting to happen.

CTV reported Sunday that the U.S. has asked Canada to join the program amid heightened concerns over North Korea, which has been threatening to launch missile strikes against North America’s western seaboard.

Canadian officials have refused to confirm or deny the report.

In the House of Commons on Monday, Defence Minister Peter MacKay noted Canada had “declined in the past to participate in U.S.-led ballistic missile defence.”

But MacKay refused to rule out any future involvement, saying: “We have, in the past . . . consistently reviewed our security policies with a mind to ensuring that Canadians were protected at home and abroad.”

NDP foreign affairs critic Paul Dewar said Canadians have opposed any Canadian participation in the missile defence “scheme” for decades.

“The new proposal is an expansion of a system that the National Academy of Sciences calls, and get this, ineffective,” he said.

Dewar noted Public Safety Minister Vic Toews refused to rule out Canada participating in the system Sunday, telling CTV: “We need to have a broader discussion about that.”

“Why are Conservatives now opening the door to a potential military boondoggle yet again that would actually make the F-35s really look pale in comparison?” Dewar said. “Why not, instead, do the hard diplomatic work necessary, including with China, to reduce ballistic missile threats?”

The question of participating in a U.S.-led missile defence system has been a prickly issue for Canadian governments since it was first proposed by then-president Ronald Reagan during the 1980s.

Most recently, Paul Martin’s Liberal government declined joining the program in 2005.

Original Article
Source: canada.com
Author: Lee Berthiaume

No comments:

Post a Comment