Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Monday, June 17, 2013

Scholars, authors wary of government review of Canadian history

Canadian history has a reputation for being dull, but our nation's past is arousing passions in Ottawa of late.

The federal government has spent $28 million commemorating the bicentennial of the War of 1812, a program that some critics say was an extravagant exercise in drumming up patriotism.

The Conservative government's latest foray into the history books has also divided opinion. Last month, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage started a "thorough and comprehensive review of significant aspects of Canadian history."

Even though the committee pulled back from its original mandate, which would have investigated how history is being taught in Canadian schools, some still bristle at its focus on Canadian military history. The opposition and other critics contend that the government's real agenda is to re-write Canadian history from a more militaristic, capital-C Conservative perspective.

The government and its supporters argue that it's entirely appropriate and laudable that a government wants to ensure that Canadians understand the history that shaped the country we live in today.

Michael Enright, host of The Sunday Edition on CBC Radio One, spoke with two of Canada's eminent historians to hear their concerns about the government's approach to Canadian history.

Ramsay Cook, a Governor-General's Award-winning author and professor emeritus at York University, said he suspects the government's motives are driven less by curiosity than by politics.

"I think the problem is that governments, when they interest themselves in history, they have answers already of what they believe Canadian history is, whereas trained historians ask questions about the past. We have questions, but they have answers, which means they have an agenda."

Margaret MacMillan, the best-selling author of Paris 1919 who currently serves as the Warden of St. Anthony's College at Oxford University, said she's troubled by the federal government's emphasis on military history.

"We are a nation that does many things. Yes, we fought in four major wars in the 20th Century, and we're now involved in Afghanistan, but there's much more to us than that. The attempt to portray Canadians as somehow holding all these military values seems to me ahistorical."

The Sunday Edition host Michael Enright's full discussion with Ramsay Cook and Margaret MacMillan aired on Sunday, and can be heard again on The Sunday Edition's website, or in the link at the top-left of this page.

Original Article
Source: CBC
Author: cbc

No comments:

Post a Comment