Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Friday, October 17, 2014

Hupacasath First Nation puts China on notice over FIPA

The Hupacasath First Nation put the Chinese government on notice today, stating it does not acknowledge the Canada-China Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (FIPA) ratified by Prime Minister Stephen Harper last month.

The small B.C. First Nation is requesting other First Nations across Canada to write the People’s Republic of China and express opposition to the investment agreement, which is expected to give Chinese state-owned corporations greater power over Canada's natural resources.

The 31-year agreement, which went into effect October 1, was criticized as potentially "unconstitutional" by a prominent treaty expert, and took two years to ratify due to strong public outcry. Although it was signed to help promote Canadian business in China, experts worried that Canada would be at a strong disadvantage due to being a much weaker partner in the agreement. FIPA would also allow Chinese investors to sue Canada in the event that certain resource infrastructure projects such as the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline were cancelled.

Crucially, opponents of the deal argue that it violates section 35 of the Canadian Constitution, which requires consultation of Indigenous people regarding projects that could impact traditional territory.

"We feel it important to inform you of Hupacasath First Nation’s views and positions before you decide to do any development within our territory," the letter states. "To be clear, our dispute is with Canada and because of the FIPPA the People’s Republic of China has become involved with Canada’s internal matters. The People’s Republic of China is now on notice that any investment or development proposed by China's state-owned corporations is not welcome within Hupacasath First Nation territory."

Original Article
Source: vancouverobserver.com/
Author: Jenny Uechi

No comments:

Post a Comment