Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Thursday, November 20, 2014

Trudeau Treats Protesters Very Differently Than Harper. He Talks To Them

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau took a novel approach to dealing with climate protesters who interrupted an event over the weekend. He encouraged them to speak and listened to what they said.

The clip captured at a Toronto library stands in stark contrast with Stephen Harper's reaction to a similar climate protest during an event in British Columbia early this year. When protesters Sean Devlin and Shireen Soofi stormed the stage to call for "climate justice now", the PM stayed silent and allowed his security detail to put a stop to the disturbance.
After they had been removed Harper joked: "It wouldn't be B.C. without it. "
And Harper certainly has skirted protesters in B.C. before, such as during prorogation demonstrations in 2010 when the PM entered the legislature in Victoria in his car via an underground entrance. He later exited by a different door in order to avoid protesters.
Which door the PM uses to enter and exit an event is clearly a matter left to Harper's security detail. And protecting the most powerful person in Canada is important. But it's impossible to fully insulate a prominent politician from protesters (setting aside whether it would be desirable to do so in the first place).
So the question then is how to best deal with protesters once they're in your midst. And it's a question with political implications.
Writing in the Globe and Mail this week, pollster and pundit Bruce Anderson pointed out that having security whisk away dissenters can come off as "arrogant."
"The pictures can be ugly and it can chew up valuable time," he wrote.
Anderson lauded Trudeau for taking a "civilized" approach to the protest, one which left him looking "in control." He contrasted Trudeau's handling of the situation to the way "many Conservatives have sealed themselves off from real, genuine encounters", hoping to "minimize trouble and control the message."
How open Canadian politicians of all stripes are to interacting with the public is likely to be an important issue in the wake of a month that saw two Canadian soldier murdered and gunfire in the halls of Parliament. Security will be top of mind for all the federal leaders.
But as Harper, Trudeau and Thomas Mulcair head into an election campaign, they will need to find a balance between security and openness, between protecting themselves and protecting the freedom to protest.
Original Article
Source: huffingtonpost.ca/
Author: Michael Bolen

No comments:

Post a Comment