Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Monday, March 30, 2015

As China Rises, What Game Is President Xi Jinping Playing?

During a late-March conference concerned with developing a strategic response to China’s continued rise to global economic power, Western foreign policy and security experts sought to define the international statecraft being practiced by the country’s leadership.

The conference, held by the Carnegie Endowment, was attended by foreign affairs commentator for The Guardian Natalie Nougayrede.

Nougayrede cited former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s framing of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s goals and concerns.

First, in the face of “endemic corruption ... concerns about China’s ability to maintain strong growth” and rising “pollution levels that can provoke public outrage,” Xi wants to maintain the central authority of the Chinese Communist Party.

Second, “Xi wants to re-gear China’s economy from an old (export-led) economic model to a new (domestic consumption-led) model. ... a huge task, especially when growth rates are slowing down.”

Third, “China wants to continue to seize what its official lexicon calls a ‘strategic opportunity’ to increase its global influence.” This requires a commitment by China to lower tensions between Asian nations.

Nougayrede continued:
The bottom line is that China has embarked on a new level of global activism. It has overtaken the United States as the world’s leading trade power. Today 123 countries in the world have China as their leading trading partner, while the US can count only 64. China is on the lookout for investment opportunities that aren’t just US treasury bonds. It wants to challenge the mighty dollar, and its currency, the renminbi, now accounts for 15% of global trade transactions. …
China sees the US as trying to oppose its growing international status. Its success with the Asian Investment Bank is a clear sign of the power of its huge currency reserves. But it would be a mistake to think that China believes the US is in decline. China’s demographic trends aren’t so good, and its military power and innovation capabilities are nowhere near as strong as America’s. Xi’s perception is that US power will continue through the 21st century, which means that common dialogue must somehow be found through creative diplomacy. Last November’s joint US-China statement on climate change fitted that picture.
None of this means there will be much trust in the air. China has a 2,500-year history of strategic thinking driven by a deep distrust of external players. Don’t expect a People’s Daily front page proclaiming a new era of Chinese openness towards the west. Nor should Vladimir Putin’s Russia think that it will find an amenable partner in Xi’s China if it continues to turn its back on Europe. China sees Russia as a declining power that can eventually be transformed into an economic colony – reduced to the role of oil and gas provider. China believes it can make strategic gains if Europe and Russia continue to clash.
Read more here.

Original Article
Source: truthdig.com/
Author:

No comments:

Post a Comment