Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Saturday, September 19, 2015

Men Educated At Ivy League Schools Vastly Outearn Female Classmates

Attending the country's most prestigious schools doesn’t make you immune to the unfortunate societal stew of sexism, bias and history that drives the income gap between men and women in the U.S.

Men who graduate from the country’s most exclusive universities vastly outearn their female counterparts, according to startling statistics released over the weekend by the Department of Education.

Ten years after starting at Harvard University, men make on average $53,600 more per year than women who graduated from the school. That's a lot of money -- roughly equivalent to the U.S. median income. This is the pattern at all of the country's elite schools, as The New York Times reported. The gulf is widest at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where men outearn female graduates by an eye-popping $58,100 a year, the Times noted.

You can view the full data set at the education department’s website. The department tracked income, as reported on federal tax returns, for nearly every college student who took out a federal student loan and enrolled in 2000 and 2001. Those without loans and those who were in graduate school a decade after starting college were not included in the data set, but those who didn't finish their undergraduate degree were. The New York Times parsed the data and graciously allowed us to reproduce their chart:


Much of the gender wage gap can be traced back to men and women’s choice of college major, experts told The Huffington Post. However, that doesn’t necessarily mean the brightest, most successful women in the country are voluntarily deciding to make less money than men. The choice to move away from STEM majors -- those in science, tech and engineering that generally lead to high-paying jobs -- comes after years of subtle biases that often steer young girls into the social sciences and humanities.

“Women overwhelmingly choose humanities and social sciences. Men choose engineering and computer science. The men are getting the big bucks,” said Linda Babcock, an economics professor at Carnegie Mellon who has researched the gender gap extensively. “But that’s not necessarily because of inherent interest in the topics.”

A decade after starting college, the average female Carnegie Mellon graduate earns an average of $76,200; their male counterparts earn $108,000. An overwhelming majority of social science majors at the university are women, Babcock said.

“If you went to mechanical engineering,” she added, “it would look exactly the opposite.”

If you compare the incomes of men and women who major in the same subject, about half of the gender gap disappears, said Amelia Haviland, one of Babcock’s colleagues at Carnegie Mellon. Still, even when they major in the same subjects as men, women often end up taking less lucrative jobs after school. More women now major in math than men, Haviland noted, yet there remains a big gap between what male and female math majors earn. Men are more likely to become actuaries (salaries can reach as high as $250,000 a year); women more often wind up teaching in high school, where salaries are lower.

If you then take into account the fact that women are more likely to drop out of the workforce at different times for child-caring, the gap shrinks some more.

The penalty women face in their careers for having children is what's really holding women's pay back, Claudia Goldin, an economics professor at Harvard, told HuffPost. “The real issue is what happens after [graduation] -- at 10 to 15 years out the gaps are huge,” said Goldin, who is currently heading up a big cross-university program that aims to get more women into economics, a field in which they're underrepresented.

“Every school is looking at this data and thinking, ‘oh, this is bad,’” Babcock said. “But the status quo is working against them.”

As awareness of this problem grows, a lot of schools and companies are trying to push more women toward computer science and engineering.

“Across the university many of us are very passionate about understanding this," Pulin Sanghvi, executive director of career services at Princeton, told The Huffington Post. At the start of the year, the Ivy League school convened a diversity inclusion committee in the career services department, focused on not only gender, but ethnicity. Princeton's gender income gap falls slightly below Harvard's, according to the Department of Education's data.

Babcock notes there’s a lot of subtle things going on that push young women away from studying STEM -- peers might discourage girls from the “boy subjects,” and there are few role models in the media for females.

I remember, decades ago, wondering what happened to all the girls in my honors science and math classes when I showed up on the first day of eighth grade. The following year, there were only two girls in my Advanced Placement biology class. It wasn't exactly an encouraging situation. My bio teacher once paused in the middle of a lecture to tell me I was pretty.

“Think about what you see in the media, the faces of Silicon Valley,” Babcock said. “Who do you see as the head of tech companies? You see men. Those are impactful messages that young people see over and over and over again. And you start thinking, ‘that’s not for me.’ The messages are subtle. The impact is not.”

Original Article
Source: huffingtonpost.com/
Author: Emily Peck

No comments:

Post a Comment