Democracy Gone Astray

Democracy, being a human construct, needs to be thought of as directionality rather than an object. As such, to understand it requires not so much a description of existing structures and/or other related phenomena but a declaration of intentionality.
This blog aims at creating labeled lists of published infringements of such intentionality, of points in time where democracy strays from its intended directionality. In addition to outright infringements, this blog also collects important contemporary information and/or discussions that impact our socio-political landscape.

All the posts here were published in the electronic media – main-stream as well as fringe, and maintain links to the original texts.

[NOTE: Due to changes I haven't caught on time in the blogging software, all of the 'Original Article' links were nullified between September 11, 2012 and December 11, 2012. My apologies.]

Friday, March 18, 2016

Ted Cruz’s New Foreign Policy Team Makes Him as Extreme as Donald Trump

GOP presidential contender Ted Cruz has unveiled a foreign policy team full of conspiracy theorists and arch-neoconservatives who support policies just as belligerent as those of Donald Trump. While Cruz has been supported by some Republican figures (most recently Senator Lindsay Graham) who consider him a relatively moderate alternative to Trump, the foreign policy advisors he has assembled show him to be running as an extremist.
Among the advisors Cruz has assembled are:

Frank Gaffney: Gaffney is the president of the famously Islamophobic Center for Security Policy. He has developed a number of theories about how Muslims are invading and conquering the United States, including by infiltrating the government via the Muslim Brotherhood and by conquering Dearborn, Michigan, and turning it into a “no go zone” for non-Muslims (although he recently admitted to The Intercept has never been there). He also thinks tax lobbyist Grover Norquist is a stealth jihadist.

Andrew McCarthy: McCarthy is a former Assistant U.S. Attorney who has in recent years transformed into a far-right pundit for the National Review. In recent years he has claimed that President Obama was “raised as a Muslim,” and that Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin may be infiltrating the U.S. government on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood. In between his lurid conspiracizing, McCarthy has also been an outspoken of post-9/11 torture practiced by the Bush administration including waterboarding, which he has written, “is not torture and was never illegal under U.S. law.”

Michael Ledeen: Ledeen, a Reagan-era consultant for the National Security Council who is now a fellow at the hawkish Foundation for Defense of Democracies, has been among the most bellicose neoconservatives of the past few decades. During the 1980s he helped set up the deal at the heart of the Iran-Contra scandal. In 2002, following warnings from former George H.W. Bush National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft that invading Iraq “could turn the whole region into a cauldron,” Ledeen stated his support for such an outcome, writing that, “One can only hope that we turn the region into a cauldron, and faster, please. If ever there were a region that richly deserved being cauldronized, it is the Middle East today.” In the run-up to the invasion, Ledeen accused French President Jacques Chirac of “casting his lot with radical Islam and with the Arab extremists,” even darkly suggesting that the war may need to go “far beyond the boundaries of the Middle East, into the heart of Western Europe.” Since the failure of the war, Ledeen, apparently unfazed by the human carnage of Iraq’s collapse, has continued to advocate further destabilizing actions across the Middle East, particularly in Iran.

Elliot Abrams: Abrams is a former Reagan and Bush official who pled guilty to withholding information from Congress in the Iran-Contra scandal (he was later pardoned). He was a signatory of the Project for New American Century’s 1998 letter calling on President Clinton to ramp up military operations against Iraq. He was one of President George W. Bush’s key Middle East advisers. The month before the U.S. invaded Iraq, he told Americans not to worry about civilians, saying, “We recognize that military action in Iraq, if necessary, will have adverse humanitarian consequences. We have been planning over the last several months, across all relevant agencies, to limit any such consequences and provide relief quickly.” In 2010, he complained that American Jews lacked a sufficient “commitment to Israel” because they voted for President Obama. He is an advocate for an expansive American ground presence in Syria, writing, “Combat forces may not be needed, but advisers certainly will be and in the thousands. It is not at all clear that any other forces–Jordanian, Emirati, or Saudi–can actually perform this function that Americans perform so well.”

During a normal election cycle, this collection of warmongers, criminals and conspiracy theorists would place Cruz on the utmost fringe of his own party. But with Trump running a campaign that has been unprecedented in its bombastic rhetoric, Cruz will make the case that his own extremist platform is the reasonable alternative.

Original Article
Source: theintercept.com/
Author: Murtaza Hussain Zaid Jilani

No comments:

Post a Comment